roovie

Use Cases · Building Owners

See how every building in your portfolio actually performs.

Physics-based energy analysis across your entire portfolio. Consistent methodology. Comparable results. No modeling specialist required.

Portfolio-ScalePhysics-BasedConsistent MethodologyASHRAE 140 Verified
Contact our team
The Challenge

You own the buildings. You can't see inside them.

Most building owners know two things about energy: the utility bill total and the ENERGY STAR score. Neither tells you why a building consumes what it does, which systems drive the cost, or what a specific upgrade would actually save.

Study Cost

$25K–$100K

Per building for a detailed energy study. Most portfolios never commission one.

Delivery Time

4–8 weeks

Per building with traditional modeling. A 50-building portfolio takes a year.

Portfolio Coverage

~0%

Of buildings in a typical portfolio that have been energy modeled. The data to make capital decisions simply doesn’t exist.

You can't prioritize what you can't measure. And measuring has always been too expensive to do at scale.

Portfolio Intelligence

Every building. Same methodology. Comparable data.

Roovie models every building in your portfolio with the same physics engine, the same methodology, and the same output format. The result: comparable data across buildings that was never comparable before.

End-Use Visibility

See where energy goes — heating, cooling, lighting, equipment, fans, DHW. A full simulation, not an estimate.

EUI Benchmarking

Every building ranked by Energy Use Intensity against CBECS national data. Know which buildings underperform — and by how much.

Peak Load Analysis

Peak heating and cooling demand identified to the exact hour. Know which buildings drive demand charges.

Cost and Carbon

Energy costs by fuel type. Carbon emissions by scope. The numbers your ESG reporting needs — building by building.

Capital Decisions

Compare every upgrade scenario with real physics

LED retrofit, heat pump conversion, envelope improvement, cool roof coating: each runs as a full simulation. Rank by payback, annual savings, or carbon impact. Every savings number is backed by a calibrated physics model.

#BuildingEUISavingsPayback
1Warehouse District112.4$84,200/yr2.1 yrs
2Midtown Office Tower91.7$62,400/yr3.4 yrs
3Harbor View School78.3$41,800/yr4.2 yrs
4Eastside Retail68.9$28,100/yr5.7 yrs
5City Park Apartments54.2$12,600/yr8.1 yrs
Beyond Analysis

When the model says “upgrade the roof”, we make the roof coating too

When the simulation identifies buildings where solar heat gain through the roof is the dominant cooling driver, NanoTech's advanced cool roof coatings provide the solution. ENERGY STAR and CRRC validated. The analysis and the upgrade come from the same company, with physics-based M&V to confirm the savings.

Roovie Engine

Identifies the problem

NanoTech Materials

Provides the solution

Roovie M&V

Verifies the savings

Your energy consultant delivers the analysis on Roovie. When the analysis recommends a material upgrade, the material is already in the ecosystem.

Delivery

Your own portal: not someone else's spreadsheet

Your energy consultant runs Roovie. You see the results in your own client portal: buildings, simulations, reports, and 3D models, all accessible from your dashboard.

3D building models: Explore every building in 3D. Select zones, view assemblies, inspect HVAC assignments.

Simulation results: Baseline vs. upgrade scenarios side by side. Energy, cost, and carbon deltas with monthly breakdowns.

Reports on demand: Download PDF reports. View shared links. Access any building in the portfolio at any time.

The analysis doesn't disappear into an email attachment. It lives in a portal your team can revisit whenever a capital decision comes up.

Portfolio dashboard

5

Buildings

3

Simulated

2

Reports

1

Active ECM

Warehouse DistrictEUI 112.4
Midtown OfficeEUI 91.7

See your portfolio on Roovie

Contact our team